Email
Print
Email
Print

Serena Williams beats Victoria Azarenka to win the Brisbane International

Decrease fontDecrease font
Enlarge fontEnlarge font
Serena Williams wasn't at her best, but she still beat Victoria Azarenka in straight sets at Brisbane. (William West/ AFP via Getty Images)

Serena Williams wasn’t at her best, but she still beat Victoria Azarenka handily. (William West/AFP via Getty Images)

New year, same result. Serena Williams successfully defended her title at the Brisbane International with a 6-4, 7-5 win over Victoria Azarenka in the final, a decisive signal to the rest of the field that the No. 1 player in the world has no plans on slowing down in 2014. After a grueling 2013 season that saw her post a 78-4 record and winning a career-best 11 titles, Serena stormed through the field in Brisbane, capturing her 58th career title without dropping a set.

Three thoughts on Serena’s inaugural championship run:

Serena wasn’t at her best and she didn’t have to be: More than her 120 mph serve, powerful groundstrokes, or athleticism, Serena’s ability to win matches while playing her B-level tennis is the most dominant aspect of her game. She wasn’t as sharp as she was at this time last year, when she won the title dropping just 17 games (she lost that many in her last two matches this year). Against Maria Sharapova in the semifinals, she struggled with her serve, double-faulting twice in the second set tiebreak, and still won 6-2, 7-6 (7). In Saturday’s final, she overcame a second set wobble after breaking to a 2-0 lead. Azarenka reeled off four straight games to earn a 4-2 lead before the American found her rhythm again and battled back to close out the match in two sets.

Serena will be more than pleased with the result, in which she extended her current win-streak to 22 matches — her last loss was to Azarenka at the Western and Southern Open in August — but always the perfectionist, she’ll be focused on improving at the Australian Open. A hungry Serena is a deadly one and she surely feels robbed of her last two trips to Melbourne, where freak injuries have derailed her last two campaigns.

Serena is still beatable in Melbourne…hypothetically: In a wager of Serena vs. The Field at the upcoming Australian Open, which way to do you go? The five-time Australian Open champion hasn’t won the title since 2010. During her Aussie drought her chief rival Azarenka won it twice goes into this year’s tournament as the two-time defending champion. Only two players in the current top ten have beaten Serena at a Slam: Sharapova at Wimbledon in 2004 and Jelena Jankovic at the Australian Open in 2008.

Based on her own history, the threats to Serena’s first Australian Open title in three years would most likely come from big-hitting players who go on a hot streak, such as Sabine Lisicki at Wimbledon last year, or from herself, (see losses to Sloane Stephens in Melbourne last year and Virginie Razzano at the 2012 French Open). As we saw in Brisbane, Serena is still prone to less-than-stellar days and mid-match wobbles.

A solid week for Azarenka: The loss snapped her 24-match win streak in Australia, dating back to the 2011 Australian Open and she showed some rust during the tournament, including a surprising bout of nerves against Stefanie Voegele in the quarterfinals, squandering seven match points before winning 6-4, 6-7(7), 6-1. She followed that up with a good win over Jankovic, coming back to win 1-6, 6-3, 6-4. and put forth a good test against Serena. Azarenka continues to be one of the best battlers in the women’s game and her fight was on full display in Brisbane. That’s great news given her anemic finish to the 2013 season, where she went 1-4 after the U.S. Open and complained of motivation issues. As the only woman who has consistently challenged Serena at the top of the game, women’s tennis needs Azarenka at her best.

  • Published On Jan 04, 2014
  • 12 comments
    saveserve325
    saveserve325

    I love,love,love when Serena wins! Goooo Serena! Goooo Venus! Goooo Williams! Goooo,USA!

    Asicran_i
    Asicran_i

    the whole story: maybe Serena wasn't at her best but clearly neither was Vika

    acash626
    acash626

    Serena has 3 levels to her game. When she brings her " A" game, she beats any of her competitors. Her " B " game gets her past almost all of her competition. It's her " C " level game where she is most vunerable and gives her opponents their best chance of defeating her ( e.g. 2012 French Open.) 

    Curtos07
    Curtos07

    Meh. Auckland is the only tournament that matters. :p

    spystud
    spystud

    I would comment because I watched every point of the last 3 matches, but some idiot will just troll with her tired meme. Wish we could actually talk tennis on this site again. This site is over.

    topsport1
    topsport1

    @spystud not sure why you'd expect any talk....hardly anyone posts anything here anymore....I'm here all the time but it's always 0 comments :)

    topsport1
    topsport1

    @spystud at any rate...watched the match and same old story, great news for Serena and increasingly bad news for women's tennis as a whole....she's so good and the rest so not the suspense has been drained...granted, Maria and Vika didn't get rolled but the tour really could have used a win by one of them...for a casual, or non-Serena fan the WTA has become incredibly mundane


    yes, the same men win, but that is men, not man....the ladies are into a very troubling time here I believe and I'm not terribly high on the youth either, but let's se

    lawrence
    lawrence

    Topsport1,  why is it bad news for women's tennis, because Serena is winning.  I never read these sentiments when Navratillova, graf, and Evert were winning.  Something is terribly wrong here.